G6 leaders advance climate agenda while Trump’s US defends fossil fuels
11 June 2018 | Mitigation
A meeting of G7 leaders in Canada ended with a split over climate change on Saturday.
Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and the EU agreed new language on the importance of carbon pricing and a “just transition” to clean energy, as well as reaffirming their commitment to the Paris Agreement.
The US asserted its position in a separate paragraph, prioritising economic growth and energy security. It would support countries in using “all available energy sources”, including to “access and use fossil fuels more cleanly and efficiently,” the statement said.
On the biggest source of friction at the summit, trade, the leaders arrived at a consensus position – only for president Donald Trump to retract US endorsement after leaving the meeting.
Trump refused to even attend a scheduled session on climate change, leaving the G6 to advance the agenda without him. It contrasts with last year’s summit in Italy, which resulted in a minimalist outcome as leaders held out hope of winning Trump round.
“It is true that we didn’t resolve all the problems facing the planet this weekend in Charlevoix, but we made significant progress,” said Canadian prime minister and host Justin Trudeau at the closing press conference.
German chancellor Angela Merkel released a photo to illustrate the dynamic of talks, which immediately went viral: she and the leaders of France, UK and Japan standing over a defiant Trump, seated with his arms crossed.
“Trump’s petulant refusal to join G7 climate talks must finally banish any illusions of working with him,” said Nick Mabey, head of European environmental thinktank E3G. “The other G6 leaders must react by forging a partnership to drive forward climate action as the glue to the maintain the global rules-based system.”
The G6 promised a “just transition, including increasing efforts to mobilize climate finance from a wide variety of sources”. Just transition is climate jargon for helping communities dependent on carbon-intensive industries like coal mining find new jobs in a clean economy.
It addresses an obstacle to climate ambition in many of the member states: lobbying from trade unions and industry groups fearful of the economic impacts. For example, the German government has committed to phase out coal use but delegated the contentious timeline to a 31-member commission.
There was also a G6 commitment to work with all levels of government, business and civil society, including indigenous groups, on the transition to clean energy.
Absent from the statement was any reference to an existing G7 pledge to phase out “inefficient” fossil fuel subsidies by 2025. The Overseas Development Institute estimates they are channeling a collective $100 billion a year to coal, oil and gas interests.
Source: Climate Change News